Not every arbitration needs — or benefits from — an administering institution. Some disputes run under institutional rules with the structure and oversight that brings; others proceed ad hoc, managed directly by the parties and the tribunal, often under frameworks such as the UNCITRAL Rules. Choosing between them is a genuine strategic decision, and we guide clients through it with commercial clarity before representing them fully in either format.
Administered arbitration offers institutional supervision, established rules, support with appointments and challenges, and a scrutiny of the award that can strengthen enforceability — at the price of institutional fees and some procedural rigidity. Ad hoc arbitration offers flexibility and potential cost savings for parties who can cooperate — at the price of losing the institution’s safety net when a party obstructs or an appointment stalls. Under the UAE Arbitration Law, the courts can assist ad hoc proceedings (for example with appointments), but that assistance takes time.
Framework selection at the contract or dispute stage — matched to the counterparty, the amounts at stake and the likelihood of obstruction.
Full representation in institutional references and ad hoc proceedings alike, including under UNCITRAL Rules.
Procedural design in ad hoc cases — building the timetable, rules and logistics that an institution would otherwise supply.
Can't find your answer? Our team responds to every enquiry within one business day.
Ask a questionConfidential, and free for your first review.
Call the firm+971 50 887 2523Email usinfo@abrlaw.comWhatsAppChat with our team