Design defects and engineering errors are among the costliest construction problems. Holding design consultants and engineers accountable requires proving they owed a duty of care, breached that duty, and caused quantifiable loss — technically complex work that usually requires expert engineering testimony and often arbitration or litigation against the consultant’s professional indemnity insurer.
Design consultants owe a duty of care under the UAE Civil Code and their consulting agreements. Common breaches include inadequate site investigation, design errors making works non-functional or non-compliant, failure to coordinate between design disciplines, specification errors, and inadequate project management. Proving breach requires expert testimony from another engineer confirming the work fell below professional standards.
Quantifying liability requires demonstrating actual loss — rework costs, delay costs, diminution in value, and business interruption. Liability is usually capped by contract or by professional indemnity insurance limits, so verifying the consultant’s insurance coverage before pursuing a large claim is essential, since recovery against the individual consultant is rarely practical.
Consultants often indemnify employers against third-party claims arising from design defects. Enforcing indemnity requires clear contractual language, proof the claim arose from the consultant’s breach, and notification to the consultant’s insurer before settlement to preserve indemnity and subrogation rights.
Expert engineering evidence establishing consultant breach of professional duty and causal link to loss
Quantification of damages including rework costs, delay costs, diminution in value, and business interruption
Professional indemnity insurance investigation to identify coverage and insurer contact
Indemnity claim notification and enforcement preserving the employer’s right to recover from the consultant
Arbitration or litigation representation against the consultant and their professional indemnity insurer
Who this applies to: Project owners and developers pursuing design consultants for errors causing cost overruns or delays; main contractors counter-claiming against design consultants when design defects increase rework; employers seeking indemnity recovery for third-party claims arising from consultant design errors; building users or tenants seeking recourse for design defects affecting building performance or safety.
See also: Defects & Liability Claims · Construction Arbitration Proceedings.
Can't find your answer? Our team responds to every enquiry within one business day.
Ask a questionThis page is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Figures and cost ranges are illustrative industry benchmarks, not guarantees. Law references last reviewed July 2026.
Confidential, and free for your first review.
Call the firm+971 50 887 2523Email usinfo@abrlaw.comWhatsAppChat with our team